From: REI Maverick
by Phil Grove
Much has been made recently on the news about mortgage assignment
fraud and the bank’s overall bad behavior during the housing crisis.
The purpose of this article is to give you an understanding about why
banks did what they did and how it constitutes mortgage assignment
fraud.
Mortgage Assignment Fraud | Background
Mortgage Assignment Fraud |
In the past ten years, thousands of residential mortgages were bundled together into
securitized trusts, with banks selling shares off to Wall Street
investors in a manner similar to selling shares of stock. Since banks
were no longer holding onto their mortgages, their motivation was to
create mortgages rather than to avoid creating ‘bad mortgages’ because
these bad mortgages would be someone else’s problem.
These trusts were given a name, and the name of the trust detailed
the bank involved and the year the trust was created. For example, a
trust name may be ”XXX Home Loan Trust 2006 Bank.” The name indicates
information about the particular trust such as the year it was created
(2006). Each securitized trust had a Closing Date. The
closing date is the date that the individual mortgages were put into
the Trust by its custodian. The custodian must certify that each
mortgage note is endorsed in blank and that the ownership of the note
has been transferred. This proof is most often an Assignment of
Mortgage.
Mortgage Assignment Fraud | The foreclosure problem
Once loans began defaulting, Trustees discovered that the laws
regarding Mortgage Assignments varied significantly from state to state.
One of the most significant issues was whether Mortgage Assignments
could be back-dated or have retroactive effective dates. This issue
arose because Trustees and their lawyers discovered in the foreclosure
process that the Assignments could not actually be located, or that
certain states did not allow blank Assignments. Since this issue hadn’t
yet been resolved, the assignments were signed and notarized as if the
transfer took place many years after the actual transfer date.
Mortgage Assignment Fraud | The solution
To solve the dilemma of the missing Assignments, new Assignments were
created and recorded, and most of these Assignments did not state the
actual date that the Assignment took place. These new Assignments were
prepared by specially selected law firms that specialized in providing
mortgage default services to lenders. The new Assignments were prepared
in the name of Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems (MERS) as
“nominee” for the mortgage company.
Mortgage Assignment Fraud | The solution hitting the fan
The new Assignments were prepared to conceal the actual date that the
property was acquired by the Trust. An examination of the
Assignments filed showing the grantee as the Trust – such as our earlier
example of “XXX Home Loan Trust 2006 Bank” – shows that most of these
new Assignments were prepared and filed in 2008 and 2009. While
the exact closing date can only be determined by looking at the trust
documents, any Trust that includes the year in 2006 in its title most
likely closed in 2006. These assignments showing dates 2-3 years later
obviously didn’t add up. The reason is that if a Mortgage
Assignment is dated, notarized, and filed in a year after the year set
forth in the name of the grantee trust on the Assignment, it is actually
an Assignment specially, and in many cases, fraudulently, made to
facilitate foreclosures. In many cases, some of these new
Assignments were created after the foreclosure process had been
initiated. Hence, we have mortgage assignment fraud.
The
mortgage industry was so concerned about this type of mortgage
assignment fraud that in the Fall of 2010 it took the unbelievably
ballsy step of trying to cram through Congress legislation that would
have validated foreclosures by rubber stamping the questionable
documentation behind securitized mortgages. Thankfullly, President Obama
vetoed that legislation that would’ve allowed mortgage assignment
fraud.
No comments:
Post a Comment